The macro narrative of the US stock market is weird. It has
been on a tear higher since early 2009, recovering the losses seen during the
2008 crash, and continuing on to make new all-time highs. Meanwhile, the real
economy is having a much harder time keeping up with the higher valuations. Mainly
due to unemployment and to a certain extent underemployment, which is filtering
through to low-to-no wage growth, the same for trends in consumer spending, and
the same for GDP, and the same for inflation expectations, the list goes on.
How soon is still very fuzzy, but whenever interest rates
start rising, the discounting approach to equity valuation would suggest a
correction in stock prices, or at the very least a slowing of the rate that the
securities appreciate. Especially when further increases in dividend payouts
don’t seem very likely from this point. Companies have already paid out massive
amounts of cash from earnings back to shareholders in the form of dividends and
share buybacks, which have done nothing but support the run-up we’re seeing in
stocks.
Low interest rates have been a good input for a valuation
model that uses them as the denominator, perfectly suited for an economy
emerging from a recession. But as the denominator in the model gets bigger, the
output should get smaller. Stock prices going down flies in the face of
intuition, so I suggest we simply just pick another way to prove that stocks
should definitely be worth more over time. A method that better suits a rising interest
rate environment.
The logic would be, if interest rates are rising the real
economy should be growing [at least consumer prices should]. If the economy is
growing coming out of a recession or a protracted period of slow growth,
behavioral economics can kick into overdrive and propel equity prices higher as
investors rationalize higher and higher multiples of earns in their forecasting
and valuation models. That’s all good and well, but the real economy doesn’t
have the convenience of swapping out one valuation method for another to
outline the same growth narrative.
No comments:
Post a Comment